The Self-Appointed Altruists

Their arrival portends rising local prices and a cultureand enlightened rich-country governments propose
shock. Many of them live in plush apartments, or fivetough rules on third-world factory wages, backed up
star hotels, drive SUV's, sport $3000 laptops andby trade barriers to keep out imports from countries
PDA's. They earn a two figure multiple of the localthat do not comply. Shoppers in the West pay more -
average wage. They are busybodies, preachers,but willingly, because they know it is in a good cause.
critics, do-gooders, and professional altruists.AlwaysThe NGOs declare another victory. The companies,
self-appointed, they answer to no constituency.having shafted their third-world competition and
Though unelected and ignorant of local realities, theyprotected their domestic markets, count their bigger
confront the democratically chosen and those whoprofits (higher wage costs notwithstanding). And the
voted them into office. A few of them are enmeshedthird-world workers displaced from locally owned
in crime and corruption. They are thefactories explain to their children why the West's new
non-governmental organizations, or NGO's.Somedeal for the victims of capitalism requires them to
NGO's - like Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Medecinsstarve."NGO's in places like Sudan, Somalia, Myanmar,
Sans Frontieres, or Amnesty - genuinely contribute toBangladesh, Pakistan, Albania, and Zimbabwe have
enhancing welfare, to the mitigation of hunger, thebecome the preferred venue for Western aid - both
furtherance of human and civil rights, or the curbing ofhumanitarian and financial - development financing, and
disease. Others - usually in the guise of think tanks andemergency relief. According to the Red Cross, more
lobby groups - are sometimes ideologically biased, ormoney goes through NGO's than through the World
religiously-committed and, often, at the service ofBank. Their iron grip on food, medicine, and funds
special interests.NGO's - such as the International Crisisrendered them an alternative government - sometimes
Group - have openly interfered on behalf of theas venal and graft-stricken as the one they
opposition in the recent elections in Macedonia. Otherreplace.Local businessmen, politicians, academics, and
NGO's have done so in Belarus and Ukraine,even journalists form NGO's to plug into the avalanche
Zimbabwe and Israel, Nigeria and Thailand, Slovakiaof Western largesse. In the process, they award
and Hungary - and even in Western, rich, countriesthemselves and their relatives with salaries, perks, and
including the USA, Canada, Germany, and Belgium.Thepreferred access to Western goods and credits.
encroachment on state sovereignty of international lawNGO's have evolved into vast networks of patronage
- enshrined in numerous treaties and conventions -in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.NGO's chase
allows NGO's to get involved in hitherto strictlydisasters with a relish. More than 200 of them opened
domestic affairs like corruption, civil rights, theshop in the aftermath of the Kosovo refugee crisis in
composition of the media, the penal and civil codes,1999-2000. Another 50 supplanted them during the civil
environmental policies, or the allocation of economicunrest in Macedonia a year later. Floods, elections,
resources and of natural endowments, such as landearthquakes, wars - constitute the cornucopia that
and water. No field of government activity is nowfeed the NGO's.NGO's are proponents of Western
exempt from the glare of NGO's. They serve asvalues - women's lib, human rights, civil rights, the
self-appointed witnesses, judges, jury and executionerprotection of minorities, freedom, equality. Not
rolled into one.Regardless of their persuasion or moduseveryone finds this liberal menu palatable. The arrival
operandi, all NGO's are top heavy with entrenched,of NGO's often provokes social polarization and
well-remunerated, extravagantly-perked bureaucracies.cultural clashes. Traditionalists in Bangladesh, nationalists
Opacity is typical of NGO's. Amnesty's rules preventin Macedonia, religious zealots in Israel, security forces
its officials from publicly discussing the inner workingseverywhere, and almost all politicians find NGO's
of the organization - proposals, debates, opinions - untilirritating and bothersome.The British government
they have become officially voted into its Mandate.ploughs well over $30 million a year into "Proshika", a
Thus, dissenting views rarely get an openBangladeshi NGO. It started as a women's education
hearing.Contrary to their teachings, the financing ofoutfit and ended up as a restive and aggressive
NGO's is invariably obscure and their sponsorswomen empowerment political lobby group with
unknown. The bulk of the income of mostbudgets to rival many ministries in this impoverished,
non-governmental organizations, even the largest ones,Moslem and patriarchal country.Other NGO's - fuelled
comes from - usually foreign - powers. Many NGO'sby $300 million of annual foreign infusion - evolved
serve as official contractors for governments.NGO'sfrom humble origins to become mighty coalitions of
serve as long arms of their sponsoring states -full-time activists. NGO's like the Bangladesh Rural
gathering intelligence, burnishing their image, andAdvancement Committee (BRAC) and the
promoting their interests. There is a revolving doorAssociation for Social Advancement mushroomed
between the staff of NGO's and governmenteven as their agendas have been fully implemented
bureaucracies the world over. The British Foreignand their goals exceeded. It now owns and operates
Office finances a host of NGO's - including the fiercely30,000 schools.This mission creep is not unique to
"independent" Global Witness - in troubled spots, suchdeveloping countries. As Parkinson discerned,
as Angola. Many host governments accuse NGO's oforganizations tend to self-perpetuate regardless of
- unwittingly or knowingly - serving as hotbeds oftheir proclaimed charter. Remember NATO? Human
espionage.Very few NGO's derive some of theirrights organizations, like Amnesty, are now attempting
income from public contributions and donations. Theto incorporate in their ever-expanding remit "economic
more substantial NGO's spend one tenth of theirand social rights" - such as the rights to food, housing,
budget on PR and solicitation of charity. In a desperatefair wages, potable water, sanitation, and health
bid to attract international attention, so many of themprovision. How insolvent countries are supposed to
lied about their projects in the Rwanda crisis in 1994,provide such munificence is conveniently
recounts "The Economist", that the Red Cross feltoverlooked."The Economist" reviewed a few of the
compelled to draw up a ten point mandatory NGOmore egregious cases of NGO imperialism.Human
code of ethics. A code of conduct was adopted inRights Watch lately offered this tortured argument in
1995. But the phenomenon recurred in Kosovo.Allfavor of expanding the role of human rights NGO's:
NGO's claim to be not for profit - yet, many of them"The best way to prevent famine today is to secure
possess sizable equity portfolios and abuse theirthe right to free expression - so that misguided
position to increase the market share of firms theygovernment policies can be brought to public attention
own. Conflicts of interest and unethical behaviorand corrected before food shortages become acute."
abound.Cafedirect is a British firm committed to "fairIt blatantly ignored the fact that respect for human and
trade" coffee. Oxfam, an NGO, embarked on apolitical rights does not fend off natural disasters and
campaign targeted at Cafedirect's competitors,disease. The two countries with the highest incidence
accusing them of exploiting growers by paying them aof AIDS are Africa's only two true democracies -
tiny fraction of the retail price of the coffee they sell.Botswana and South Africa.The Centre for Economic
Yet, Oxfam owns 25% of Cafedirect.Large NGO'sand Social Rights, an American outfit, "challenges
resemble multinational corporations in structure andeconomic injustice as a violation of international human
operation. They are hierarchical, maintain large media,rights law". Oxfam pledges to support the "rights to a
government lobbying, and PR departments, head-hunt,sustainable livelihood, and the rights and capacities to
invest proceeds in professionally-managed portfolios,participate in societies and make positive changes to
compete in government tenders, and own a variety ofpeople's lives". In a poor attempt at emulation, the
unrelated businesses. The Aga Khan Fund forWHO published an inanely titled document - "A Human
Economic Development owns the license for secondRights Approach to Tuberculosis".NGO's are becoming
mobile phone operator in Afghanistan - among othernot only all-pervasive but more aggressive. In their
businesses. In this respect, NGO's are more like cultscapacity as "shareholder activists", they disrupt
than like civic organizations.Many NGO's promoteshareholders meetings and act to actively tarnish
economic causes - anti-globalization, the banning ofcorporate and individual reputations. Friends of the
child labor, the relaxing of intellectual property rights, orEarth worked hard last year to instigate a consumer
fair payment for agricultural products. Many of theseboycott against Exxon Mobil - for not investing in
causes are both worthy and sound. Alas, most NGO'srenewable energy resources and for ignoring global
lack economic expertise and inflict damage on thewarming. No one - including other shareholders -
alleged recipients of their beneficence. NGO's are atunderstood their demands. But it went down well with
times manipulated by - or collude with - industrialthe media, with a few celebrities, and with
groups and political parties.It is telling that the denizenscontributors.As "think tanks", NGO's issue partisan and
of many developing countries suspect the West andbiased reports. The International Crisis Group published
its NGO's of promoting an agenda of tradea rabid attack on the then incumbent government of
protectionism. Stringent - and expensive - labor andMacedonia, days before an election, relegating the
environmental provisions in international treaties mayrampant corruption of its predecessors - whom it
well be a ploy to fend off imports based on cheapseemed to be tacitly supporting - to a few footnotes.
labor and the competition they wreak onOn at least two occasions - in its reports regarding
well-ensconced domestic industries and their politicalBosnia and Zimbabwe - ICG has recommended
stooges.Take child labor - as distinct from theconfrontation, the imposition of sanctions, and, if all else
universally condemnable phenomena of childfails, the use of force. Though the most vocal and
prostitution, child soldiering, or child slavery.Child labor, invisible, it is far from being the only NGO that
many destitute locales, is all that separates the familyadvocates "just" wars.The ICG is a repository of
from all-pervasive, life threatening, poverty. As nationalformer heads of state and has-been politicians and is
income grows, child labor declines. Following the outcryrenowned (and notorious) for its prescriptive - some
provoked, in 1995, by NGO's against soccer ballssay meddlesome - philosophy and tactics. "The
stitched by children in Pakistan, both Nike and ReebokEconomist" remarked sardonically: "To say (that ICG) is
relocated their workshops and sacked countless'solving world crises' is to risk underestimating its
women and 7000 children. The average family incomeambitions, if overestimating its achievements."NGO's
- anyhow meager - fell by 20 percent.This affairhave orchestrated the violent showdown during the
elicited the following wry commentary fromtrade talks in Seattle in 1999 and its repeat
economists Drusilla Brown, Alan Deardorif, and Robertperformances throughout the world. The World Bank
Stern:"While Baden Sports can quite credibly claim thatwas so intimidated by the riotous invasion of its
their soccer balls are not sewn by children, thepremises in the NGO-choreographed "Fifty Years is
relocation of their production facility undoubtedly didEnough" campaign of 1994, that it now employs
nothing for their former child workers and theirdozens of NGO activists and let NGO's determine
families."This is far from being a unique case.many of its policies.NGO activists have joined the
Threatened with legal reprisals and "reputation risks"armed - though mostly peaceful - rebels of the
(being named-and-shamed by overzealous NGO's) -Chiapas region in Mexico. Norwegian NGO's sent
multinationals engage in preemptive sacking. More thanmembers to forcibly board whaling ships. In the USA,
50,000 children in Bangladesh were let go in 1993 byanti-abortion activists have murdered doctors. In Britain,
German garment factories in anticipation of theanimal rights zealots have both assassinated
American never-legislated Child Labor Deterrenceexperimental scientists and wrecked property.Birth
Act.Former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich,control NGO's carry out mass sterilizations in poor
observed:"Stopping child labor without doing anythingcountries, financed by rich country governments in a
else could leave children worse off. If they are workingbid to stem immigration. NGO's buy slaves in Sudan
out of necessity, as most are, stopping them couldthus encouraging the practice of slave hunting
force them into prostitution or other employment withthroughout sub-Saharan Africa. Other NGO's actively
greater personal dangers. The most important thing iscollaborate with "rebel" armies - a euphemism for
that they be in school and receive the education toterrorists.NGO's lack a synoptic view and their work
help them leave poverty."NGO-fostered hypeoften undermines efforts by international organizations
notwithstanding, 70% of all children work within theirsuch as the UNHCR and by governments. Poorly-paid
family unit, in agriculture. Less than 1 percent arelocal officials have to contend with crumbling budgets
employed in mining and another 2 percent inas the funds are diverted to rich expatriates doing the
construction. Again contrary to NGO-profferedsame job for a multiple of the cost and with
panaceas, education is not a solution. Millions graduateinexhaustible hubris.This is not conducive to happy
every year in developing countries - 100,000 inco-existence between foreign do-gooders and
Morocco alone. But unemployment reaches more thanindigenous governments. Sometimes NGO's seem to
one third of the workforce in places such asbe an ingenious ploy to solve Western unemployment
Macedonia.Children at work may be harshly treated byat the expense of down-trodden natives. This is a
their supervisors but at least they are kept off the farmisperception driven by envy and avarice.But it is still
more menacing streets. Some kids even end up with apowerful enough to foster resentment and worse.
skill and are rendered employable."The Economist"NGO's are on the verge of provoking a ruinous
sums up the shortsightedness, inaptitude, ignorance,backlash against them in their countries of destination.
and self-centeredness of NGO's neatly:"Suppose thatThat would be a pity. Some of them are doing
in the remorseless search for profit, multinationals payindispensable work. If only they were a wee more
sweatshop wages to their workers in developingsensitive and somewhat less ostentatious. But then
countries. Regulation forcing them to pay higher wagesthey wouldn't be NGO's, would they?
is demanded... The NGOs, the reformed multinationals